ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Pre-dialysis care and access type are associated with transplant referral, evaluation, and waitlisting.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuboptimal dialysis initiation is associated with adverse patient outcomes. Whether it is also associated with access to downstream transplant care is unknown.
methodsAdults initiating dialysis treatment for kidney failure in the Southeast U.S., from 1/1/2015 to 12/31/2019 were identified from the United States Renal Data System, linked to the Early Steps to Transplant Access Registry, and followed through 12/31/2021. The primary exposure was pre-dialysis care and categorized as highly, moderately, minimally, or non-optimal based on presence of nephrology care, dialysis type (in-center or home hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis), and vascular access vs. catheter. Primary outcomes were referral to a transplant center within 12-months of dialysis initiation and evaluation start at a transplant center within 6 months of first referral. Multivariable competing risk models quantified the association between pre-dialysis care context and referral and evaluation.
resultsAmong 49,057 patients initiating dialysis, 28.8%, 15.5%, 31.0%, and 24.8% are highly, moderately, minimally, and non-optimal start, respectively. Patients initiating dialysis in moderately, minimally, and non-optimal ways are 28% (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.72, [95% CI: 0.69 - 0.72], 31% (0.69, [0.66 - 0.71], and 57% (0.43, [0.41 - 0.44]) less likely to be referred as compared with highly optimal starters. Those who had a non-optimal start are also 37% less likely to start the evaluation after being referred (0.63, [0.59 - 0.66]) as compared with highly optimal dialysis starters, while all other groups have a similar likelihood.
conclusionsMore than half of U.S. adults with kidney failure initiate dialysis in a minimal or non-optimal way leading to reduced likelihood of transplant referral and evaluation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.