ReviewNature protocols2026
Rapid volumetric bioprinting of pristine protein-based (bio)inks.
Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Volumetric bioprinting (VBP) enables the rapid photopolymerization of 3D constructs by modifying the illumination patterns within a build volume. However, only a few unmodified, pristine protein-based bioinks can be used for VBP, making the resulting (bio)printed volumes sometimes incompatible with further modification steps required for extended applications and thus limiting the wider adoption of VBP. We have recently developed new methods for VBP, in which unmodified protein-based (bio)inks with tyrosine groups, including those based on silk, decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) and gelatin, can be (bio)printed, in their pristine state, by using the tris(2,2-bipyridyl)dichlororuthenium(II) hexahydrate/sodium persulfate photoinitiator system to form sophisticated shapes and architectures. Here, we provide step-by-step instructions to complete the VBP process and include the characterization of these bioinks. After treatment, the volumetrically printed silk sericin constructs show properties including reversible shrinkage and expansion, or shape-memory, whereas the volumetrically printed silk fibroin constructs exhibit broadly tunable mechanical performances ranging from a few hundred pascals to hundreds of megapascals. Both types of silk-based (bio)inks as well as dECM (bio)inks are cytocompatible. We further cover several demonstrations that show the potential uses of volumetrically (bio)printed silk and dECM constructs in clinical and biomedical applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.