Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41975036›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2026

Light-responsive DNA nanostructures.

Bharath Raj Madhanagopal, Ting Wang, Arun Richard Chandrasekaran

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bharath Raj MadhanagopalDepartment of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1043-8754
Ting WangThe RNA Institute, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7630-4148
Arun Richard ChandrasekaranDepartment of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA. arun@albany.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6757-5464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA is ideally suited for designing dynamic nanostructures that are reconfigured by external stimuli. One of these stimuli - light - has been used to control DNA nanostructures by the incorporation of light-responsive linkers into DNA strands. Light responsiveness adds to the already rich repertoire of functional properties of DNA nanostructures, including homogenous size, biocompatibility and programmability. Developments in the chemical synthesis of various light-responsive moieties and their incorporation into oligonucleotides have helped to create a library of DNA nanostructures with controlled reconfiguration, high thermal stability, enhanced nuclease resistance and triggered detachment of guest molecules. With these light-responsive features, DNA nanostructures are useful in applications such as diagnostics, drug delivery, data storage, plasmonics and site-directed reactions. In this Review, we discuss the emerging research trends in light-responsive DNA nanostructures, with specific focus on the types of light-responsive functional groups available for incorporation into DNA, strategies used to design and construct light-responsive DNA nanostructures, and their applications.

Indexed as

DNA NanostructuresLightHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.