Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41975029›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

CT-Based Glioma Segmentation Using Deep Learning: Validation for Emergency Neuro-oncological Care.

Zohal Alnour Ahmed Emam, Emel Ada, Berrin Çavuşoğlu, Burçin Pehlivanoğlu, M Alper Selver, Kadir Akgüngör

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zohal Alnour Ahmed EmamDepartment of Medical Physics, Institute of Health Sciences, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1601-7424
Emel AdaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey. emel.ada@deu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6935-1472
Berrin ÇavuşoğluDepartment of Medical Physics, Institute of Health Sciences, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1997-8861
Burçin PehlivanoğluDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6535-8845
M Alper SelverDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering and Izmir Health Technologies Development and Accelerator (BioIzmir), Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8445-0388
Kadir AkgüngörDepartment of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1071-4405

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and rapid delineation of diffuse gliomas is essential in emergency neuro-oncology, yet MRI is often unavailable. We present a deep-learning segmentation approach for routine non-contrast CT and evaluate its technical feasibility and WHO grade-stratified performance, demonstrating its potential as a decision-support tool in time-sensitive, resource-limited clinical settings. CT scans from 206 adults with histopathologically confirmed diffuse gliomas were retrospectively collected from a single center and were divided into a development cohort (n = 177) and an independent validation cohort (n = 29). The glioma segmentation network (GSN) consists of a ResNet-18 encoder and five-stage U-Net decoder, trained with inverse-frequency weighted cross-entropy to address class imbalance. Model development involved five-fold cross-validation on the development cohort (results reported in the main text). Primary outcome measures were Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). Reference segmentations were generated by a board-certified neuroradiologist with over a decade of clinical experience using MITK. In the independent validation cohort, DSCs were 0.846 for grade 2 (95% CI 0.835-0.856), 0.806 for grade 3 (95% CI 0.800-0.811), and 0.802 for grade 4 (95% CI 0.796-0.809). Corresponding HD95 values were 13.677 mm (95% CI 12.70-14.65), 16.193 mm (95% CI 14.73-17.65), and 18.776 mm (95% CI 17.95-19.90). Inference throughput was 20 slices per second (95% CI 16.1-26.3). The proposed GSN demonstrates robust internal performance and clinically meaningful segmentation accuracy on independent CT data, supporting the technical feasibility of CT-based automated glioma delineation for emergency and resource-constrained settings. Evaluation was performed at the 2D slice level. Limitations include the single-center design and reliance on reference segmentations performed by a single neuroradiologist. Prospective multi-center validation is warranted before routine clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Brain neoplasmsDeep learningGliomaImage processing computer-assistedTomography X-ray computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.