ArticleScientific reports2026
Objective quantification of chemotherapy-induced madarosis: a pilot study of an automated computer vision pipeline for eyebrow density assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced madarosis significantly impacts patient quality of life, yet current assessment methods rely heavily on subjective grading, limiting the evaluation of preventive strategies. This study presents a novel automated computer vision pipeline for objective longitudinal quantification of periocular hair density change and assesses its intra-session repeatability in a pilot clinical setting. The methodology integrates facial landmark detection, multi-temporal registration, and trimap deep learning-based hair segmentation with custom morphological filtering to isolate eyebrow hair structures from noise. The framework was applied to breast cancer patients undergoing anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy with localized cryotherapy. To evaluate the measurement repeatability, four standardized photographs (two with eyes open and two with eyes closed) were acquired and processed independently at each time point. Results confirmed the system's sensitivity in tracking individual evolution, accurately capturing the contrasting density changes observed between subjects from baseline to follow-up. Although the longitudinal trajectories are presented as proof of concept of temporal tracking capability, the method exhibited relatively high precision, with intra-session standard deviations consistently remaining below 12% regardless of hair density, with slightly higher values observed at baseline in some cases. We conclude that this automated computer vision pipeline provides a robust, operator-independent metric for monitoring madarosis. By overcoming the limitations of manual grading, this tool represents a promising step toward establishing a reliable primary endpoint for future multicentre clinical trials once validated in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.