Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41975011›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Experimental evaluation of sustainable jute-basalt hybrid FRP systems for flexural strengthening of RC beams with variable wrapping and light-weight aggregate replacement.

Panumas Saingam, Muhammad Adnan Hanif, Fahad Ahmed, Burachat Chatveera, Gritsada Sua-Iam, Ali Ejaz, Qudeer Hussain, Preeda Chaimahawan, Chisanuphong Suthumma, Afaq Ahmad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Panumas SaingamDepartment of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand.
Muhammad Adnan HanifNational Institute of Transportation, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Fahad AhmedWater Engineering and Management, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Burachat ChatveeraDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Thammasat University (Rangsit campus), Pathum Thani, 12121, Thailand.
Gritsada Sua-IamDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon, Bangkok, 10800, Thailand.
Ali EjazNational Institute of Transportation, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Qudeer HussainDepartment of Civil Engineering, Kasem Bunding University, Bangkok, Thailand. ebbadat@hotmail.com.
Preeda ChaimahawanSchool of Engineering, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand. preeda.ch@up.ac.th.
Chisanuphong SuthummaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom, 73140, Thailand. chisanuphong.s@ku.th.
Afaq AhmadFaculty of Technology, Art and Design, OsloMet University, Oslo, Norway. afaq.ahmad@oslomet.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research experimentally assesses the flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete (RC) beams through the use of sustainable jute–basalt (JB) hybrid fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) systems with variable wrapping schemes and lightweight aggregate (LWA) replacement. A total of 18 beams with identical geometry and reinforcement were tested under four-point bending, including controls, basalt FRP (BFRP), jute FRP (JFRP), and hybrid JB FRP systems in bottom-only, U-wrap, and full-wrap configurations. The results indicate that FRP confinement significantly modified failure modes, transitioning from the brittle crushing in controls to rupture- or debonding-controlled mechanisms. BFRP significantly enhanced strength, achieving up to 36.8% greater capacity in full-wrap beams, while JFRP improved ductility but was more prone to premature debonding. Hybrid JB FRP systems demonstrated the most balanced performance, with U-wrap hybrids achieving 39.6% higher load capacity and maintaining significant deformation capacity even in LWA concrete. Load–strain responses confirmed yielding of steel reinforcement in all cases, though maximum strains were reduced after confinement due to premature fiber debonding or rupture at smaller deflections. The use of LWA reduced ductility of control beams, but hybrid U-wrap systems successfully compensated for this limitation, providing the highest load and deflection values among all specimens. These results emphasize the potential of hybrid natural–mineral FRP systems as sustainable alternatives to synthetic composites, providing competitive ductility and reinforcement for structural retrofitting applications in both conventional and lightweight concretes.

Indexed as

DuctilityFlexural capacityJute–basalt hybrid FRPLightweight aggregatesSustainable strengthening

Identifiers

PMID41975011
PMCPMC13237110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.