Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41975010›Full record

ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Therapeutic options for occupational skin cancer (BK 5102, BK 5103)].

Konstantin Drexler, Andrea Bauer

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Konstantin DrexlerKlinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland. konstantin.drexler@ukr.de.
Andrea BauerKlinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncidence of keratinocyte skin cancer has been continuously rising in recent decades. At the same time, the number of occupational skin cancers has also increased. Treatment depends on clinical manifestation, extent of actinic keratosis, field cancerization and, in case of squamous cell carcinoma, on the tumor stage.

objectivesThis work aims to enhance the understanding of the challenges associated with the treatment of occupational skin cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis article is based on a review of the literature.

resultsDifferent therapeutic options for the treatment of occupational skin cancer are presented and discussed.

conclusionThe need to treat occupational skin cancer is expected to increase in the future. An increasing number of modern therapeutic options will enable adequate patient care.

Indexed as

Cutaneous Squamous Cell CarcinomaOccupational DiseasesSkin NeoplasmsHumansKeratosis, ActinicNeoplasm StagingNon-Melanoma Skin NeoplasmsActinic keratosisCutaneous squamous cell carcinomaField cancerizationKeratinocyte skin cancerTumor stage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.