ReviewAnnals of hematology2026
Artificial intelligence reshaping the paradigm of hematologic malignancy diagnosis and treatment: From static assessment to dynamic precision management.
Review in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Editorial: Evaluating differentiation therapy and biomarkers in myeloid malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being explored as a tool to support more precise and dynamic management in the diagnosis and treatment of hematologic malignancies. Unlike previous reviews focused on single disease types or isolated technological pathways, this paper provides a comprehensive overview of AI’s current applications and latest advancements in diagnosis, classification, prognosis assessment, and treatment decision-making for leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and myelodysplastic syndromes. It encompasses key technical pathways, including morphology, imaging, flow cytometry, and multimodal data fusion, and further constructs an AI-driven dynamic diagnosis and treatment system along with its integrated deployment framework for electronic health records. This framework is intended to illustrate how multimodal data integration, dynamic risk assessment, and more coordinated longitudinal management could be supported within an integrated workflow. This integrated dynamic model provides a structured roadmap for intelligent, end-to-end management of hematologic malignancies and holds promise for advancing future intelligent clinical pathways. While AI demonstrates significant potential to enhance diagnostic consistency, optimize risk stratification, and enable personalized treatment, its development remains constrained by challenges such as data bottlenecks, insufficient cross-institutional model generalization, and ethical oversight. Future efforts should focus on advancing multicenter prospective validation, adhering to international standards like TRIPOD + AI, and refining data privacy, model interpretability, and ethical oversight systems. These advances may help support the future development of more personalized and dynamic patient management strategies within an evidence-based framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.