Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41974979›Full record

ArticleAmbio2026

Conflicts hinder research into animal movements.

Víctor Martín-Vélez, Joan Navarro, Isabel Afán, Tomas Montalvo, Andy J Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Víctor Martín-VélezInstitut de Ciències del Mar (ICM), CSIC, Barcelona, Spain. victormartin@icm.csic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4846-8177
Joan NavarroInstitut de Ciències del Mar (ICM), CSIC, Barcelona, Spain.
Isabel AfánInstitut de Ciències del Mar (ICM), CSIC, Barcelona, Spain.
Tomas MontalvoAgencia de Salut Publica de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Andy J GreenEstación Biológica de Doñana (EBD), CSIC, Seville, Spain.

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación 10.13039/501100011033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Satellite tracking has revolutionized our understanding of animal migration, yet its reliability increasingly depends on the geopolitical stability of the regions frequented by wildlife. Here, we show that military-induced interference with global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) during ongoing conflicts in Eastern Europe has severely compromised the accuracy of global positioning systems (GPS)-based tracking data for black-headed gulls (Chroicocephalus ridibundus). In 2024-2025, GPS trajectories revealed erratic, low-quality, and geographically implausible positions coinciding with known zones of electronic warfare. These inaccuracies hinder efforts to locate breeding colonies, identify key stopover habitats, and assess disease transmission risks posed by migratory birds, particularly for zoonoses such as highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1. Our findings illustrate how modern conflicts now extend their impact into ecological research infrastructures, calling for systematic correction methods and international coordination to safeguard the robustness of movement ecology studies and One Health models in a geopolitically unstable world.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationCharadriiformesGeographic Information SystemsWarfareAnimalsEurope, EasternInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza in BirdsDiseasesGPS trackingGullsMigrationOne healthSpoofing

Identifiers

PMID41974979
PMCPMC13319858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.