ArticleCommunications biology2026
Infants' spontaneous movements explore arm dynamics.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From scribbling to painting: children's drawing as an evolutionary laboratory for multisensory and sensorimotor integration.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning to control the body is a fundamental process in human development. Before acquiring goal-directed skills such as walking or reaching, infants undergo developmental phases characterised by spontaneous movements with no apparent objective. These motions are believed to shape the sensorimotor system by facilitating body-environment interaction. However, how this exploration contributes to sensorimotor structuring remains an open question. A major challenge in studying spontaneous movements has been the lack of appropriate comparative data. To address this, we introduce a synthetic data-driven approach to analyse infant motion. We analysed 20 infants comprising 270 spontaneous movement units from 12 RGB-D infant recordings (22.5 ± 5.96 movement units per infant) together with 206 units from 8 RGB YouTube recordings (25.75 ± 6.34 movement units per infant), and compared these empirical datasets against two synthetic datasets. Our analysis revealed that spontaneous movements, both at the infant and cluster level, engaged arm dynamics more extensively than reaching-like motions and displayed acceleration distributions skewed towards trajectories optimised for maximal dynamic excitation. Furthermore, the kinematic space explored by infants exhibited significantly higher variability. These findings demonstrate that spontaneous movements are dynamically rich, providing emergent features potentially helpful for infants to explore movement possibilities and develop coordination and control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.