Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41974936›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2026

Infants' spontaneous movements explore arm dynamics.

Juan H García-Guzmán, Eduardo Ros, Niceto R Luque

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juan H García-GuzmánApplied Computational Neuroscience Group, TIC-117, CITIC-University of Granada, Granada, Spain. jhelg@ugr.es.
Eduardo RosApplied Computational Neuroscience Group, TIC-117, CITIC-University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Niceto R LuqueApplied Computational Neuroscience Group, TIC-117, CITIC-University of Granada, Granada, Spain. nluque@ugr.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning to control the body is a fundamental process in human development. Before acquiring goal-directed skills such as walking or reaching, infants undergo developmental phases characterised by spontaneous movements with no apparent objective. These motions are believed to shape the sensorimotor system by facilitating body-environment interaction. However, how this exploration contributes to sensorimotor structuring remains an open question. A major challenge in studying spontaneous movements has been the lack of appropriate comparative data. To address this, we introduce a synthetic data-driven approach to analyse infant motion. We analysed 20 infants comprising 270 spontaneous movement units from 12 RGB-D infant recordings (22.5 ± 5.96 movement units per infant) together with 206 units from 8 RGB YouTube recordings (25.75 ± 6.34 movement units per infant), and compared these empirical datasets against two synthetic datasets. Our analysis revealed that spontaneous movements, both at the infant and cluster level, engaged arm dynamics more extensively than reaching-like motions and displayed acceleration distributions skewed towards trajectories optimised for maximal dynamic excitation. Furthermore, the kinematic space explored by infants exhibited significantly higher variability. These findings demonstrate that spontaneous movements are dynamically rich, providing emergent features potentially helpful for infants to explore movement possibilities and develop coordination and control.

Indexed as

ArmChild DevelopmentBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansInfantMaleMovement

Identifiers

PMID41974936
PMCPMC13269772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.