Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41974924›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Construction of a data-driven knowledge discovery path from the perspective of intelligent academic evaluation: an empirical study based on institutional repository and solr technology.

Linong Lu, Baolin Yang, Xiaochun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linong LuNorthwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou, 730000, P. R. China. luln@llas.ac.cn.
Baolin YangNorthwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou, 730000, P. R. China.
Xiaochun WangNorthwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou, 730000, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the problems of low efficiency, long turnaround cycles and difficulty integrating data in manual statistics of traditional academic evaluation (especially for professional title evaluation and award assessment), this study constructs a data-driven intelligent academic evaluation support system based on an Institutional Repository (IR). The system integrates dynamic data and a configurable rule engine to enhance the automation, standardization and intelligence of academic evaluation workflows. It provides accurate data support for academic evaluation, and enables knowledge discovery and efficient management throughout the academic evaluation process. By systematically analyzing the bottlenecks in manual statistics, the “Intelligent Academic Evaluation” system was designed and implemented. The system adopts the Java Web hierarchical architecture and integrates Solr indexing technology (with comparative justification of search technology selection) to achieve dynamic matching of multi-source heterogeneous data, providing efficient data retrieval support for intelligent evaluation.It combines the Spring Boot framework with the Redis caching mechanism to improve data processing performance; We have developed functional modules such as flexible configuration of academic evaluation conditions, qualification review, and batch export of reports, covering the entire process of achievement collection, statistics, and review, providing functional guarantees for the implementation of intelligent evaluation.Meanwhile, in combination with the actual business scenarios of a certain scientific research institution, the corresponding modules were deployed in the institutional knowledge base system and empirical verification was carried out. After verification, the system has achieved the following main results: (1)The professional title evaluation cycle has been shortened by approximately 70%, and the statistical accuracy rate has been increased to 98%, significantly reducing the cost of manual intervention in academic evaluation; (2)The system supports custom reward schemes and automatic report generation to achieve structured output of evaluation data; (3)The system delivers a second-level response to millions of academic literature records (supported by stress test data) to ensure the efficient operation of academic evaluations. Empirical results show that this system can significantly enhance the efficiency and quality of academic evaluation, providing a replicable technical pathway for universities and research institutions to implement a data-driven intelligent academic evaluation system.Limitations such as data quality dependence and scalability under high concurrency are discussed, and future improvement directions are proposed.

Indexed as

Academic evaluationAchievement awardsInstitutional repository (IR)Professional title evaluationRule engineSolr technology

Identifiers

PMID41974924
PMCPMC13234165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.