Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41974872›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Composite materials with recycled fibers: Evaluation of the effect of different fibers on gypsum composites.

Mark Hemphill, Alexander L Yarin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark HemphillUnited States Gypsum, 700 North US Highway 45, Libertyville, IL, 60048-1296, USA.
Alexander L YarinDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 842 W. Taylor St, Chicago, IL, 60607-7022, USA. ayarin@uic.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of alternate more sustainable materials in building construction products has been a focus for the last two decades. Defining new methods to utilize materials destined for landfill while not increasing cost and discovering beneficial reuse for such materials is commended in today’s industry. This work explores three types of fibers (paper, hemp and fiberglass) with the goal of improving overall performance and sustainability of wallboard by means of making gypsum-fiber composites. Circular composite disks containing 0–2 wt% fibers in gypsum were tested with a biaxial bending apparatus. Fracture toughness was also calculated in the case of 1.5 wt% fiber loading. When recycled paper fibers were utilized in composites, the resulting composite exhibited a shift towards a less brittle material. The improvement in load resistance and deflections in the biaxial bending test was comparable to those of gypsum composites with high-energy manufactured fiberglass. Within the range investigated, hemp fibers, while sustainable, did not provide improved performance and may need to be refined further, which would add more cost. Fracture toughness improved with all fiber loadings with fiberglass revealing the highest toughness. SEM images suggest that the paper fibers had good surface bonding with the gypsum matrix, while the fiberglass appeared less, indicating different mechanisms to achieve improved performance.

Indexed as

FiberFiberglassFracture toughnessGypsumHempPaper

Identifiers

PMID41974872
PMCPMC13280370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.