ArticleScientific reports2026
Smallholder farmers' adaptation strategies among coffee farming household heads in the Kafa biosphere reserve, Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate change poses a major threat to smallholder agriculture in ecologically sensitive regions like Ethiopia. This study assess climate trends and identifies the determinant that influence adoption of adaptation strategies among coffee-farming households in the Kafa Biosphere Reserve, Ethiopia. Data was gathered through household surveys, focus group discussions, and key informant interviews. Climatic trends were analyzed using the Mann-Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimator, while a Multivariate Probit Model were used to evaluate factors driving four adaptation strategies: agronomic practices, soil and water conservation (SWC), livelihood diversification, and agroforestry. Results show a significant warming, especially in minimum and mean temperatures, with erratic rainfall. Agronomic practices were the most adopted strategy (23.1%), while 29.9% of households undertook no adaptation. The econometric analysis reveals that access to institutional resources, particularly access to credit, extension services, and early warning systems, are the key determinant factors that enable adoption. Conversely, forest dependency significantly reduces the likelihood of adopting nearly all strategies. Female-headed households are more likely to diversify livelihoods but less likely to adopt labor-intensive SWC. Farm size and agroecological zone (AEZ) also shape strategy choice. Moreover, significant complementarities exist between SWC and agroforestry. The study concludes that building climate resilience requires moving beyond the dissemination of technologies to actively strengthen institutional support, design gender-responsive programs, break forest-dependency traps through integrated livelihood approaches, and promote synergistic practice packages. These targeted interventions are essential for enhancing equitable adaptive capacity in smallholder systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.