ArticleScientific reports2026
rbpCNN: a biophysics-informed deep learning model for predicting piRNA and mRNA interactions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting the interactions between piRNA sequences and mRNA sequences is central to understanding post-transcriptional regulation in the germline and to the design of perturbations that modulate PIWI (P-element-induced wimpy testis) guided silencing. Any improvement in the accuracy of predictions about RNA sequence interactions is vital to the enhancements that can be made in many critical medical fields. This paper proposes rbpCNN, a lightweight convolutional neural network (CNN) that augments nucleotide-pair encoding with biophysically motivated interaction channels prior to learning. By adding one compatibility channel, two helix-run channels, one positional channel, and one structural channel, we aimed to support the predictions of the CNN layer and improve prediction accuracy. The resulting network is lightweight and achieves strong performance relative to existing solutions on this benchmark. Experimental results showed that rbpCNN achieves an AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 96.55% and an accuracy of 90.66% in fivefold validation, and an AUC of 94.19% and an accuracy of 86.74% on a separate, fully independent external dataset, with performance competitive with and, in several metrics, exceeding previously reported results on the same benchmark.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.