ArticleScientific reports2026
Determinants of delivery rider disability severity based on judicial adjudication records in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid expansion of the gig economy has increased instant delivery crashes (IDCs), yet the determinants of rider disability remain unclear. This study analyzed 633 adjudicated rider injury cases (2015–2023) from Chinese legal judgments to identify risk factors for the Highest Assessed Disability Grade (HADG). We integrated sociodemographic, vehicular, spatiotemporal, and crash-mechanism variables into ordered logit models to quantify risk determinants. Results indicate that while most adjudicated injuries were non-permanent, lower-limb fractures constituted the primary mechanism of established disability. Significant risk factors for severe disability included rider age over 50, migrant status, and collisions involving automobiles. Notably, a counter-intuitive “liability paradox” emerged: riders bearing secondary liability faced the highest risk of severe disability (OR = 1.943), surpassing those with primary liability (OR = 1.732) due to kinetic asymmetry. Addressing these distinct mechanisms requires a multi-layered framework. We recommend accelerating physical infrastructure segregation to decouple riders from high-energy motor traffic. Conversely, to curb the behavioral precursors of rider-at-fault crashes, we propose a “traffic safety credit system” combining dispatch suspensions with mandatory re-education. This study validates the utility of forensic data, offering actionable, evidence-based pathways to mitigate the severe human costs of the on-demand sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.