ArticleScientific reports2026
Calves fed more milk prioritise play over feeding in a hole-board test.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dairy calves are typically feed-restricted. Depending on its severity, hunger can improve or impair animals’ cognitive abilities, but the effect of chronic feed restriction on calf cognition remains underexplored. We used a spatial foraging task (hole-board test) to assess whether chronic feed restriction impairs cognitive performance in dairy calves provided 6 L/day of milk (restricted) compared to calves provided up to 12 L/day (enhanced). Calves had to recall 4 milk reward locations among 15 possibilities; locations remained constant for 14 trials (initial learning), and were then changed and kept constant for 6 trials (re-learning). We measured calves’ ability to remember locations already visited within trials (working and general working memory) and recall reward locations between trials (reference memory). We also measured play behaviour to explore trade-offs between foraging and playing in the testing arena (larger than calves’ home-pen). Restricted calves had better working and reference memory, shorter latencies to reach the first bucket, and completed trials faster, indicating higher food motivation. Enhanced calves were less motivated to engage in the test but played more than restricted ones. This highlights how hunger can shift priorities to foraging. Future research should explore trade-offs between important behaviours like play and feeding to understand the value calves place on different activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.