ArticleScientific reports2026
An adaptive cryptographic fusion framework for secure and efficient medical image encryption.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secure transmission and storage of medical images remain a critical requirement in modern healthcare, where ensuring both robust security and computational efficiency is essential. To address these challenges, we propose an Adaptive Cryptographic Fusion Model (ACFM), a novel seven-stage encryption framework specifically designed for medical imaging applications. The model integrates hybrid entropy-driven pseudo-random sequence generation, multi-channel image fusion, and plaintext-driven parameterization, ensuring that the encryption process is both dynamic and highly sensitive to image content. The pipeline further incorporates multi-path substitution, dynamic propagation-based diffusion, and index-driven scrambling, culminating in ciphertext reinforced with integrity checks via hash embedding. This architecture provides strong resistance against statistical, differential, and plaintext-based attacks, while maintaining full reversibility for reliable decryption. The proposed ACFM was evaluated using benchmark datasets including Diabetic Retinopathy Detection, Skin Cancer Segmentation, and Lung Cancer Detection, and compared with state-of-the-art methods such as VFHE-DWOA, HSFQM, DNA-ECC, and CLM. Experimental results demonstrate that ACFM achieves superior performance, with Pixel-Level Reconstruction Fidelity of 98.9% at 30 iterations and maintaining above 96.7% accuracy at 200 iterations, outperforming competing methods by 2–4%. Similarly, decryption reconstruction fidelity consistently exceeded 96%, while processing time was reduced by up to 20–30%, requiring only 5.4 s at 30 iterations. These findings establish ACFM as a robust, efficient, and scalable encryption strategy, making it well-suited for secure medical image management in real-world healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.