ArticleScientific reports2026
Bayesian optimization for uncertainty-aware prediction of rainfall-induced deformation in embankment dams.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable early warning of embankment dam failure requires predictive models that are accurate, physically consistent, and uncertainty-calibrated. This study proposes a hybrid physics-informed Bayesian deep learning framework integrating coupled u-p Biot consolidation-based finite element modeling (OpenSeesPy) with an ANN-LSTM-MDN architecture optimized via Bayesian Optimization. Deterministic hydro-mechanical responses provide physically grounded descriptors and regularization targets, while the probabilistic network decomposes uncertainty into epistemic and aleatory components. Physics-informed penalty terms enforce consolidation-consistent behavior. The approach introduces adaptive, composition-dependent uncertainty scaling to account for heterogeneous borrow materials and non-stationary rainfall effect. A novel Uncertainty Calibration Score (UCS) jointly optimizes predictive sharpness and empirical coverage. Material-adaptive dropout rates further regularize predictions for variable soil compositions. Validation on construction-phase monitoring data from the Megech Dam demonstrates substantial improvements: Negative Log-Likelihood decreased from - 2.36 to - 2.52, CRPS decreased by 33.7% ([Formula: see text]), and PICP increased from 0.86 to 0.93. Epistemic uncertainty reduced by 37.7%, while aleatoric variability remained captured. Adaptive prediction intervals revealed a pre-failure shift, with epistemic uncertainty rising to ~ 72% of total variance 8-12 weeks before observed failure. Statistical validation via block-bootstrap resampling, paired hypothesis testing (p < 0.0001), and ten-fold stratified cross-validation (CV < 8%) confirms significance and stability. This framework advances embankment dam forecasting by coupling geotechnical physics with Bayesian deep learning, providing reproducible, interpretable, and uncertainty-aware early warning insights for construction-phase variability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.