ArticleScientific reports2026
Study the behaviour of Ti-Mo-xZr alloys during thermomechanical treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Titanium and its alloys became the master materials for bio-implants, possessing perfect stability inside the human body and excellent mechanical properties over traditional implant materials. Continuous development of commercial implant alloys, including Ti-6Al-4 V, results in approaching new Ti-alloys that are more biocompatible with the human body, replacing Al and V elements with vital alternatives. In this study, the influence of Zr addition to Ti–10Mo–xZr (x = 0, 3, 6 wt%) alloys during the thermomechanical processing on the phase stability, mechanical properties, and electrochemical behavior is investigated. Thermo-Calc software, which showed that Zr addition to Ti-10Mo reduces β-transus temperature and represents Zr as a β-stabilizer element. DSC experimental results agreed with the software calculations, approving Zr addition to minimize the α to β transformation temperature.XRD and SEM results revealed β phase as predominant in Ti–10Mo (94.6%) and Ti–10Mo–6Zr (82.3%), while Ti–10Mo–3Zr alloy exhibited (52.5%) α-phase, with non-linear phase evolution with Zr content due to the dual effect of element addition and thermomechanical processing. The elastic modulus ranged from 108.9 to 120.4 GPa, with Ti–10Mo–3Zr achieving the lowest modulus. The scoped alloys achieved high compressive ductility (> 60%), which gives a good mechanical computability. Electrochemical evaluation in simulated body fluid revealed composition-dependent corrosion behavior, where β-rich alloys demonstrated enhanced polarization resistance, while microgalvanic effects in the Ti-10Mo-3Zr alloy increased corrosion susceptibility. The corrosion rates in simulated body fluid are [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] mm/year for Ti-10Mo, Ti-10Mo-3Zr, and Ti-10Mo-6Zr alloys, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.