Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41974775›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

An entropy-guided hybrid framework for real-time phishing detection in digital communication systems.

Romil Rawat, Hitesh Rawat, Anjali Rawat, Anand Rajavat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Romil RawatComputer Science Engineering Department, SVIIT, Shri Vaishnav Vidyapeeth Vishwavidyalaya, Indore, India. rawat.romil@gmail.com.
Hitesh RawatComputer Science Department, SVIIT, Shri Vaishnav Vidyapeeth Vishwavidyalaya, Indore, India.
Anjali RawatComputer Science Department, SVIIT, Shri Vaishnav Vidyapeeth Vishwavidyalaya, Indore, India.
Anand RajavatComputer Science Engineering Department, SVIIT, Shri Vaishnav Vidyapeeth Vishwavidyalaya, Indore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents CyberSafe-EG-GWO, a hybrid framework for detecting phishing-based social engineering threats in digital communication platforms. The system integrates Entropy-Based Normalization Filtering (EBNF) to retain high-information tokens, Grey Wolf Optimization (EG-GWO) for discriminative feature selection, and SpinalNet for efficient classification. By combining statistical, contextual, and semantic embeddings, the framework achieves high accuracy while reducing feature dimensionality by 40-50%, supporting scalability for real-time deployment. Evaluations on the UCI Phishing Website and CIC-Phishing Email datasets demonstrate robust performance, with hold-out test accuracies of 95.8% and 94.3%, respectively, and average inference latency of 0.214 s per sample on GPU. Cross-validation highlights feature stability (> 85% overlap) and upper-bound accuracy of over 98%, while cross-dataset tests confirm generalization across domains. The design accommodates resource-constrained environments, with potential improvements via adaptive entropy thresholding, lightweight transformer embeddings, and interpretable decision explanations. CyberSafe-EG-GWO offers a reproducible, modular approach to real-time phishing detection, balancing precision, efficiency, and operational robustness, making it suitable for deployment in both structured and unstructured communication environments.

Indexed as

Entropy-based feature selectionGrey Wolf Optimization (GWO)Phishing detectionSocial engineering attacksSpinalNet neural network

Identifiers

PMID41974775
PMCPMC13233965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.