ArticleScientific reports2026
Analysis of hyperparameter optimization effects on lightweight deep models for real-time image classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lightweight convolutional and transformer-based networks are increasingly used for real-time image classification on resource-constrained hardware, yet their practical performance is highly sensitive to training hyperparameters. This work systematically quantifies how controlled hyperparameter choices affect both accuracy and deployability for seven modern lightweight backbones-ConvNeXt-Tiny, EfficientNetV2-S, MobileNetV3-L, MobileViT v2 (S/XS), RepVGG-A2, and TinyViT-21M trained from scratch on a class-balanced 90K/10K subset of ImageNet-1K under a standardized 300-epoch protocol. We isolate the effects of learning-rate magnitude and cosine scheduling, optimizer selection (SGD vs. AdamW where appropriate), and progressively stronger regularization via RandAugment, Mixup, CutMix, and label smoothing, complemented by constrained automated searches (Optuna and population-based training). Beyond training-time analysis, we add a deployment-focused evaluation: inference latency and throughput are benchmarked on an NVIDIA L40s GPU across batch sizes 1-512, and edge feasibility is examined via Edge CPU Platform under sustained workloads. Results show that hyperparameter tuning without architectural modification yields consistent accuracy gains ([Formula: see text] Top-1 over baseline) and reveals architecture-dependent stability regions. Several models deliver strong real-time operating points: MobileNetV3-L and RepVGG-A2 achieve very low latency with high throughput on GPU, while edge tests highlight the limited benefit of batching on low-power CPUs and the importance of latency-centric model choice. The code and logs may be seen at: https://github.com/VineetKumarRakesh/lcnn-opt .
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.