Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41974750›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Impact of adjuvant therapy on survival in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy investigated by a population based cohort study.

Jia-Lei Huang, Zi-Xin Lin, Ke-Yi Zeng, Zheng Lu, Xuan-Ping Lin, He-Rui Wang, Yong-Wei Xie, Jing-Rong Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jia-Lei Huang *Department of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, Fujian, China.
Zi-Xin Lin *Academy of Integrative Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, 350122, Fujian, China.
Ke-Yi ZengThe First Clinical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China.
Zheng LuDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, Fujian, China.
Xuan-Ping LinDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, Fujian, China.
He-Rui WangDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, Fujian, China.
Yong-Wei Xie *Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University & 900th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, No.156 Northwest Second Ring Road, Fuzhou, 350025, Fujian, China. 13365917616@189.cn.
Jing-Rong Yang *Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University & 900th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, No.156 Northwest Second Ring Road, Fuzhou, 350025, Fujian, China. whale0053@fjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China No. 2024J011169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While surgical intervention administered after neoadjuvant therapy represents the standard treatment in esophageal cancer, the survival benefit conferred by adjuvant therapy administered postoperatively among this patient cohort continues to be controversial. Using real-world data, 6141 esophageal cancer patients administered neoadjuvant treatment preoperatively between 2007 and 2021 were categorized into adjuvant therapy group (n = 1116) or no adjuvant therapy group(n = 5025). No significant differences in overall survival (OS) or cancer-specific survival (CSS) were observed between groups before or after propensity score matching (PSM), and adjuvant therapy was not identified as an independent prognostic factor. However, subgroup analyses revealed important variations: patients treated in 2015-2021 derived greater survival benefit from adjuvant therapy than those in 2007-2014; female patients experienced worse CSS with adjuvant therapy, which was identified as an independent risk factor; among patients receiving preoperative systemic therapy alone, continuing systemic therapy postoperatively showed superior outcomes compared with radiotherapy or combined treatment; and among patients receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy, no significant differences were observed across different postoperative adjuvant strategies. The findings suggest that while postoperative adjuvant therapy does not provide an overall survival advantage, significant subgroup heterogeneity exists, indicating that clinical decisions should be individualized based on diagnosis year, gender, and preoperative treatment regimen.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisPropensity ScoreAdjuvant therapyEsophageal cancerNeoadjuvant therapySEERSurvival

Identifiers

PMID41974750
PMCPMC13234424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.