ArticleScientific reports2026
Introducing a predictive-oriented multi-stakeholder recommender system model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most conventional recommender systems (RSs) rely on past user behavior to predict future preferences. They fail to account for changing user expectations and variable organizational performance. To overcome this limitation, this study proposes a predictive-oriented, multi-stakeholder recommender system (RS). It measured two indices: how flexible users were, based on past interactions, and how flexible organizations were, based on the gap between what they had and what they needed. A weight adjustment function balances user and organizational influence based on these indices. The function ensures that neither stakeholder is ignored; it adjusts the weights so that higher user flexibility increases organizational preference weights, and higher organizational flexibility increases user weights. To model adaptive user expectations, the proposed RS model integrates principles from Prospect Theory and the Peak-End Rule, constructing a dynamic reference point based on the user’s peak and most recent experiences. The proposed RS model was evaluated through a simulation of 100 user profiles interacting with 30 characterized products. The results showed a 17.6% improvement in balanced resource utilization compared to a user-centric strategy. The study introduces a new paradigm for RSs that aligns long-term sustainability with user satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.