Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41974669›Full record

ArticleBDJ open2026

Black is the new blue? A cross-sectional Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) survey of colour preferences for scrubs, PPE and the dental clinical environment.

Abubaker Qutieshat, Reem T Al Amry, Zahra Mustafa, Mahmoud Rezk, Ghaid L Al Riyami, Majid Hamid-Oudjana, Laila Kebab, Ahmed Al Wahaibi, Rayhana Aouididi, Klara Avetisyan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BDJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abubaker QutieshatDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. aqutieshat@sharjah.ac.ae.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3569-6576
Reem T Al AmryOman Dental College, Muscat, Oman.
Zahra MustafaOman Dental College, Muscat, Oman.
Mahmoud RezkOman Dental College, Muscat, Oman.
Ghaid L Al RiyamiOman Dental College, Muscat, Oman.
Majid Hamid-OudjanaOman Dental College, Muscat, Oman.
Laila KebabOman Dental College, Muscat, Oman.
Ahmed Al WahaibiOman Dental College, Muscat, Oman.
Rayhana AouididiOman Dental College, Muscat, Oman.
Klara AvetisyanOman Dental College, Muscat, Oman.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColour cues in dental clinics may shape perceptions of professionalism, comfort, hygiene and anxiety, yet evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) settings across attire, PPE and the operatory environment remains limited. This study examined colour preferences across Oman, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain.

methodsA cross-sectional, web-based survey was completed by non-healthcare university students in Oman (n = 193), UAE (n = 250) and Bahrain (n = 170) (total N = 613). Participants selected preferred colours for scrubs and multiple dental items (PPE, chairside disposables, dental chair and wall colour), indicated scrub colour by clinical scenario (routine, surgical, paediatric), endorsed 'comfortable' colours (select-all), and rated five attitudinal statements on a 5-point Likert scale. Between-country differences were examined using chi-square tests (Cramer's V) and Kruskal-Wallis tests; additional modelling included GEE for comfort endorsements and exploratory logistic regression for scenario switching.

resultsScrub preferences clustered around classic colours (blue/black), with modest between-country differences (χ² = 24.09, df = 10, p = 0.007; V = 0.14). Oman most preferred black (50.3%) then blue (41.5%); the UAE preferred blue (52.8%) then black (42.0%); Bahrain preferred blue (47.1%) then black (37.1%). Scenario framing increased openness to non-classic colours in paediatric care (red and yellow), and only 16.6% retained the same scrub colour across all scenarios. For other items, classic/neutral tones predominated, with significant country differences for most categories (including masks, wall colour, dental chair, dental bib, disposable kit and suction tips), while glove colour distributions were broadly similar. Warm/yellow operatory lighting was preferred over white lighting overall (60.2%) with negligible between-country differences (p = 0.881). Comfort endorsements were highest for blue and white; patterned prints showed the clearest country separation (UAE 50.4% vs Oman 36.8% and Bahrain 35.9%), persisting in adjusted GEE models. Most respondents disagreed that darker colours appear less hygienic, although distributions differed modestly across countries (Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.010).

conclusionsColour preferences in GCC dental settings are anchored in a stable 'classic' palette, while scenario and item context introduce actionable departures, particularly for paediatric care. Black competed directly with blue across several domains and was not generally viewed as less hygienic, supporting its inclusion within a 'safe' procurement palette. Preference for warm lighting suggests a practical environmental lever to enhance perceived comfort.

Identifiers

PMID41974669
PMCPMC13076641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.