ArticleIntegrative cancer therapies
Chinese Herbal Medicine Is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer Receiving Standard Treatment: A Nationwide Population-Based Propensity Score Matching Study.
Article in Integrative cancer therapies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere is a lack of large-scale evidence regarding the prognostic impact of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) on patients with lung cancer. This paper aimed to conduct a nationwide population-based study to investigate the role of CHM for patients with lung cancer with standard treatment.
methodsPatients diagnosed with lung cancer and treated with standard therapy between 2013 and 2015 were retrospectively identified from National Health Insurance Research Database and Taiwan Cancer Registry. Patients were classified into a CHM group and a non-CHM group based on prior medical records. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate overall survival (OS) between each group.
resultsA total of 7351 matched patients were included in the outcome analysis and comparison, with 3677 patients in the CHM cohort and 3674 patients in the non-CHM cohort. The mean age of our patients was 60.68 ± 11.26 years, and 56% of our patients were female. Our results demonstrates that patients who received CHM had significantly longer OS compared to those who did not receive CHM (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.556-0.625,
conclusionOur nationwide population-based study suggested that CHM in conjugation with standard treatment was associated with improved survival in patients with advanced lung cancer. Integrating cancer treatment with CHM could be adopted in the treatment of lung cancer to improve prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.