ArticleeNeuro2026
TST Score Helper: An Open-Source Graphical User Interface for Assisted Manual Scoring of the Tail Suspension Test.
Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tail suspension test (TST) is a well-known rodent behavioral test that assesses stress and depressive-like behavior. While several automatic tail suspension test scoring programs have emerged, many researchers still prefer a manual scoring method for accuracy and reliability. However, manual scoring can introduce significant errors. Thus, in this work, we present a novel graphical user interface that assists in the manual scoring process to minimize possibility for errors. The GUI, which we refer to as "TST Score Helper," minimizes errors through consolidation of the TST scoring procedure into a single cohesive program. Further, a rescore mode enhances rigor by enabling comparison of two different scorers' mobility status timelines and rereview of periods of disagreement. In a cohort of 64 male and 45 female mice subject to closed head injury or sham injury, we demonstrate the challenges with manual scoring and we characterize performance of the TST Score Helper program. The results show how this program can reduce sources of manual scoring error and improve the fidelity of results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.