ArticleFamily medicine and community health2026
Use of point-of-care resources for management of paediatric asthma: frequency, types and temporal trends in early-career general practitioners.
Article in Family medicine and community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the frequency and temporal trends in Australian early-career general practitioners (registrars) accessing point-of-care resources (POCR) when managing paediatric asthma.
designA longitudinal analysis (2010-2019) nested within the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training project of registrars' in-consultation practice. The outcome factor in univariable and multivariable mixed effects logistic regression analyses was whether POCR was accessed for paediatric asthma problems, with year as the independent variable of interest. Further analyses compared trends (2010-2019) in asthma problem POCR use with non-asthma problem POCR use.
settingAustralian community training general practices.
participants2834 Australian general practice registrars (trainees) (participation rate 92.2%).
resultPOCR use was greater for asthma (15%) than for non-asthma problems (12.6%). The temporal increase in POCR use for paediatric asthma (OR for POCR use 1.15 per year (95% CI 1.07 to 1.24)) was greater than that for non-asthma problems (OR of 1.11 per year (95% CI 1.09 to 1.14)). This difference in rates of increase in POCR of paediatric asthma and non-asthma problems was not statistically significant.
conclusionThere are multiple possible reasons for the increasing use of POCR in paediatric asthma. This trend may reflect increasing focus on evidence-based asthma care and increasing access to high-quality asthma management online POCR available within Australia. Alternatively, paediatric asthma could represent an area of increasing clinical challenge and possible educational need for early-career general practitioners. Further research exploring the underlying reasons for the increasing POCR use in paediatric asthma is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.