ArticleBMJ global health2026
Opportunities and challenges in integrating family planning and nutrition services in Tanzania: a mixed-methods study.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging connections between family planning and nutrition to improve the health of women.BMJ global health · 2026Review
- Leveraging connections between family planning and nutrition to improve the health of women.BMJ global health · 2026Review
- Beyond parallel programmes: a roadmap for operational integration of family planning and nutrition in low- and middle-income countries.BMJ global health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntegration of family planning (FP) and nutrition is critical for improving maternal and child health, yet evidence on effective integration remains limited in Tanzania. This study explored challenges and opportunities for integrated service delivery in Tanzania.
methodsA mixed-methods approach was used, combining analysis of the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (n=15, 254 women), a desk review of 25 national documents, and qualitative data from 18 focus group discussions and 14 key informant interviews in urban and rural areas. Thematic analysis and the Walt and Gilson framework guided qualitative and policy reviews, while Poisson regression assessed quantitative associations.
resultsUnmet FP needs were high (25%). Anaemia affected 40% of women, with 6% underweight and 30% overweight/obese. Our novel quantitative analysis revealed that hormonal contraceptive use was associated with 30%-40% reduction in anaemia risk, while short birth intervals doubled the risk of being underweight. Urban women faced higher obesity rates (24%) than rural women (12%). While national policies conceptually support integration, gaps in implementation, monitoring and cross-sectoral coordination persist, including siloed programme design, fragmented governance and a lack of joint operational guidance and monitoring frameworks. Stakeholders highlighted challenges to service integration, including fragmentation between FP and nutrition services, frequent stockouts, long wait times, stigma and limited male engagement. Key opportunities identified include strong community preference for bundled services, advocacy from faith leaders for mosque-based and church-based outreach, and the potential of digital platforms and private-sector partnerships to expand access.
conclusionsAddressing integration gaps requires policies that prioritise underserved groups (eg, rural women, adolescents) and delivery models tailored to local contexts (urban vs rural), as well as strengthened implementation. Unified governance and community-based platforms, with integrated service delivery at health facilities and in the community, can enhance impact in Tanzania and similar settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.