ReviewBMJ global health2026
Leveraging connections between family planning and nutrition to improve the health of women.
Review in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The global burden of malnutrition and unmet need for family planning (FP) among women of reproductive age remains high. Leveraging the epidemiological and programmatic links between FP and nutrition could help improve outcomes in both domains for women, with wider benefits to health and well-being. Here, we draw on findings from our recently concluded Family Planning and Nutrition Project, which synthesised epidemiological and programmatic linkages between FP and nutrition, alongside other related literature, to argue that limited research connecting FP and nutrition is constraining concrete investments in this area. We identify three key areas for evidence generation with the potential to advance women's health: examining the impact of hormonal contraceptives to address anaemia caused by heavy menstrual bleeding; strengthening postpartum FP-nutrition service integration and capitalising on social protection programmes to deliver FP and nutrition-related services. Robust evidence from large-scale implementation studies focusing on these areas will be fundamental to reliably establishing the value of such approaches-including effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and key indicators such as acceptability and feasibility-and drawing further resource commitments. Investment in these approaches will help address the unique needs of women across the life course and contribute to improving women's health outcomes globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.