ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
Effect measure modification in mixtures and public health.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Methods for studying the health effects of exposure mixtures like air pollutants, water contaminants, and consumer product mixtures have been the subject of high levels of research effort and resources in recent years. Demateis et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2026;195(4):1154-1162) demonstrate a novel set of extensions to one of these approaches, Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) to study effect measure modification (EMM). In this commentary, I discuss the necessity of flexible regression methods like BKMR in the context of modern causal inference and express optimism that the continued growth of methods like BKMR can improve the link between epidemiologic data and public health actions. I expand on traditional motivations for studying EMM and comment on how they might be sometimes ill-suited for exposure mixtures. I close by remarking on how health impacts of unequal distributions of harmful exposures are masked by standard EMM-based approaches and describe how such methods, including those of Demateis et al., can be leveraged to incorporate such ideas into analysis to improve connections with public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.