Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41974058›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2026

Anatomical localization and resection of a refractory epileptic focus in the right supplementary motor area/presupplementary motor area using augmented reality: illustrative case.

Venina S Kalistratova, Gabriel Urreola, E Brandon Strong, Paolo Palmisciano, Rocelle Evangelista, Osama Raslan, Julia D Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Venina S KalistratovaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California.
Gabriel UrreolaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California.
E Brandon StrongDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California.ORCID 0000-0002-9834-4631
Paolo PalmiscianoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California.ORCID 0000-0003-0711-3975
Rocelle EvangelistaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California.ORCID 0009-0002-8798-9917
Osama RaslanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4056-3169
Julia D SharmaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedically refractory seizures occur in up to 30% of patients with epilepsy. Treatments may include neuromodulation, ablative procedures, and stereotactic surgery. Cutting-edge technology, such as neuroimaging, anatomical mapping, electroencephalography, and augmented reality (AR), assist in localization and safer treatment planning. OBSERVATIONS: A 26-year-old male with focal onset epilepsy underwent phase II monitoring with stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) that localized his seizure focus to the right supplementary motor area (SMA)/pre-SMA. A combination of traditional navigation, phase-reversal electrocorticography, and AR was used to perform anatomical localization and verification to assist with craniotomy and resection. He is now seizure free with no significant neurological deficit 9 months after surgery. LESSONS: AR has multiple applications in neurosurgery, including preoperative planning, anatomical verification, and intraoperative guidance. In this case, AR navigation provided real-time 3D overlays of MRI- and CT-derived patient anatomy onto the surgical field, allowing visualization of segmented cortical surface anatomy, vascular structures, white matter tracts, and electrodes via voice commands. This enabled precise mapping of deep-seated anatomy and electrode trajectories without increasing operative time or complication risk. Given the early stage of the technology, AR was used adjunctively with neuronavigation during SMA/pre-SMA resection and demonstrated localization concordant with traditional mapping techniques. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25611.

Indexed as

augmented realitycase reportepilepsyepileptic focus localizationvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41974058
PMCPMC13072448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.