ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
When a bigger brain is better: The case of bee olfactory learning.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- When a bigger brain is better: The case of bee olfactory learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whether bigger brains provide enhanced cognitive capacities is a long-lasting and controversial question. While big brains may not be required for producing sophisticated behavior, they could facilitate information processing and memory storage. Here, we report a positive relationship between head size and learning performance in two model bee species, using data from 2,141 individuals. Among honey bees, head size varied by about 30%, and those with larger heads showed higher olfactory learning performance for associative tasks that varied in difficulty. Microcomputed tomography measures indicated that this relationship was linked to brain size variation: The best odor learners had the largest antennal lobes. We made similar observations in bumblebees, suggesting that natural brain size variation is associated with individual cognitive variation in these social bees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.