Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41973876›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Integrating Gait Analysis and AI Into Knee Osteoarthritis Care: Protocol for a 3-Phase Participatory Qualitative Study.

Owen Ryan Lindsay, Janie L Astephen Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Owen Ryan LindsaySchool of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Surgery, Faculties of Engineering and Medicine, Dalhousie University, Dentistry Bldg, 5th Fl., 5981 University Avenue, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada, 1 4038089709.ORCID 0009-0007-0399-3035
Janie L Astephen WilsonSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Surgery, Faculties of Engineering and Medicine, Dalhousie University, Dentistry Bldg, 5th Fl., 5981 University Avenue, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada, 1 4038089709.ORCID 0000-0002-5998-7677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) leads to pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. For advanced stages, knee arthroplasty surgery is the standard treatment, yet dissatisfaction and persistent mobility deficits remain common. Current surgical decision-making processes seldom incorporate objective predictors of outcomes, such as biomechanical data. Advances in computer vision, wearable sensors, and artificial intelligence now enable efficient capture and interpretation of clinically prognostic gait features in real-world settings. However, the clinical adoption of such innovations remains limited, hindered by usability challenges, misalignment with stakeholder needs, and system-level barriers. Objective: This study aims to inform the development of a knee OA clinical decision support (CDS) tool that integrates gait analysis and artificial intelligence with clinical decision-making. More broadly, it seeks to advance a framework for participatory digital health CDS tool implementation by identifying and addressing suboptimal workflows, stakeholder priorities, and organizational challenges. Methods: This study uses a 3-phase participatory design process, with in-depth interviews conducted in each phase to generate insights that inform subsequent stages. Phase 1 investigates perceived barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of a digital CDS tool and examines current workflow processes in knee OA management. Phase 2 focuses on identifying and defining user requirements to guide solution ideation for translational digital decision support. Phase 3 assesses user acceptance of prototyped solutions. Field observations in phase 1 and usability testing in phase 3 will supplement interview findings with real-world evidence. Results: The study was funded in November 2024. Ethics approval was granted by the Nova Scotia Health Research Ethics Board on July 28, 2025. Data collection began in September 2025. As of February 2026, a total of 6 clinicians have been interviewed, with all 6 interviews transcribed and 4 coded as part of phase 1 analysis. Study completion is anticipated by August 2026. Findings will be published by January 2027. Conclusions: Our stakeholder-driven approach prioritizes both technological rigor and practical usability, addressing key human factors for successful implementation. While initially focused on Nova Scotia's orthopedic setting, this research provides a scalable framework for integrating digital decision support tools into broader clinical environments, advancing innovation in knee OA care and beyond.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGait AnalysisOsteoarthritis, KneeDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHumansQualitative ResearchAIarthroplastyartificial intelligenceclinical decision supportgait analysisimplementationinterviewknee osteoarthritispatient participationqualitative researchuser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID41973876
PMCPMC13075632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.