ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Integrating Gait Analysis and AI Into Knee Osteoarthritis Care: Protocol for a 3-Phase Participatory Qualitative Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in the biomechanics of knee osteoarthritis: biomechanical phenotyping, risk stratification, diagnosis, treatment and clinical translation-a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) leads to pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. For advanced stages, knee arthroplasty surgery is the standard treatment, yet dissatisfaction and persistent mobility deficits remain common. Current surgical decision-making processes seldom incorporate objective predictors of outcomes, such as biomechanical data. Advances in computer vision, wearable sensors, and artificial intelligence now enable efficient capture and interpretation of clinically prognostic gait features in real-world settings. However, the clinical adoption of such innovations remains limited, hindered by usability challenges, misalignment with stakeholder needs, and system-level barriers. Objective: This study aims to inform the development of a knee OA clinical decision support (CDS) tool that integrates gait analysis and artificial intelligence with clinical decision-making. More broadly, it seeks to advance a framework for participatory digital health CDS tool implementation by identifying and addressing suboptimal workflows, stakeholder priorities, and organizational challenges. Methods: This study uses a 3-phase participatory design process, with in-depth interviews conducted in each phase to generate insights that inform subsequent stages. Phase 1 investigates perceived barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of a digital CDS tool and examines current workflow processes in knee OA management. Phase 2 focuses on identifying and defining user requirements to guide solution ideation for translational digital decision support. Phase 3 assesses user acceptance of prototyped solutions. Field observations in phase 1 and usability testing in phase 3 will supplement interview findings with real-world evidence. Results: The study was funded in November 2024. Ethics approval was granted by the Nova Scotia Health Research Ethics Board on July 28, 2025. Data collection began in September 2025. As of February 2026, a total of 6 clinicians have been interviewed, with all 6 interviews transcribed and 4 coded as part of phase 1 analysis. Study completion is anticipated by August 2026. Findings will be published by January 2027. Conclusions: Our stakeholder-driven approach prioritizes both technological rigor and practical usability, addressing key human factors for successful implementation. While initially focused on Nova Scotia's orthopedic setting, this research provides a scalable framework for integrating digital decision support tools into broader clinical environments, advancing innovation in knee OA care and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.