Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41973767›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

µCT scanning effects on aDNA and a multi-step workflow for archaeological petrous portions.

Lumila Paula Menéndez, Pierre Luisi, María Clara López-Sosa, Sergio Monteiro Da Silva, Laura T Buck, Susan C Kuzminsky, Mirsha Quinto Sánchez, Anne Le Maître, Christine Chappard, Cassandra Rios and 26 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Lumila Paula MenéndezDepartment of Anthropology of the Americas, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7867-2910
Pierre LuisiInstituto de Antropología de Córdoba (IDACOR), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina.
María Clara López-SosaDepartment of Anthropology of the Americas, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Sergio Monteiro Da SilvaUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Laura T BuckResearch Centre for Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Susan C KuzminskyDepartment of Anthropology, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, United States of America.
Mirsha Quinto SánchezInstituto de investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Anne Le MaîtreHuman Evolution and Archaeological Sciences (HEAS), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2690-7367
Christine ChappardLaboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Cassandra RiosDepartment of Anthropology of the Americas, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Hans GrohUniversidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
Wara SilesLaboratorio de Tecnologías Aditivas, Instituto de Investigaciones de Antropología y Arqueología, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, La Paz, Bolivia.
Gustavo Montiel HernándezPrograma de Doctorado en Antropología, Posgrado en Antropología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Lorena Becerra-ValdiviaDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Juan Manuel ArgüellesDirección de Antropología Física, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico City, Mexico.
Bernardo YáñezCoordinación Nacional de Antropología, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico City, Mexico.
Constanza de la Fuente CastroInstituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2857-3615
Camila TamburriniCentro de Investigación sobre el Envejecimiento, Cinvestav-Sede Sur, Mexico City, Mexico.
Vivette Garcia-DeisterFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Miguel Angel Contreras-SieckDepartment of Anthropology, University of Minnesota, Minnesota and St. Paul, United States of America.
Sebastian PasqualiniInstituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano (INAPL), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Paula NovellinoConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Candela Acosta MoranoMuseo de Ciencias Naturales y Antropológicas Juan Cornelio Moyano, Mendoza, Argentina.
Daniela GuevaraConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Daniela MansegosaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Horacio ChiavazzaLaboratorio de Arqueología Histórica, Instituto de Arqueología y Etnología, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1632-8388
Sebastian GiannottiConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Luis TisseraMuseo Arqueológico Cerro Colorado, Agencia Córdoba Cultura, Cerro Colorado, Argentina.
Sebastián PastorInstituto Regional de Estudios Socioculturales (IRES), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), San Fernando del Valle de Catamarca, Argentina.
Ivan DíazUniversidad Isalud, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
María Solange GrimoldiInstituto de las Culturas (IDECU), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6232-7891
Verónica Silva-PintoFacultad de Ciencias Sociales e Historia, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago de Chile, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5826-9676
Ana SolariInstituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano (INAPL), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5677-2868
Anne-Marie PessisFundação Museu do Homem Americano (FUMDHAM), São Raimundo Nonato, Brazil.
Ramiro BarberenaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4323-1197
Nicolás RascovanInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris Cité, CNRS UMR, Microbial Paleogenomics Unit, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2129-5878

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The petrous portion of the temporal bone (often informally referred to as the "petrous bone") is a key element in human evolutionary studies due to its exceptional preservation of biomolecules and morphological information. Intensive and often redundant sampling raises concerns about sustainability and long-term conservation, however. Digital recording of morphology (micro-computed and medical tomography) can preserve what destructive sampling destroys, enabling future analyses, yet there have been concerns regarding its effect on biomolecular preservation. Here, we present a systematic observational assessment of whether micro-computed tomography (µCT)-a widely used tool for digital preservation-affects ancient DNA (aDNA) integrity in archaeological human petrous portions. We analyzed 93 archaeological samples from Argentina, of which 50 were µCT-scanned prior to molecular analysis and 43 were not. We compared six commonly used molecular parameters, including endogenous DNA content, read length, cytosine deamination patterns, and mitochondrial and nuclear contamination estimates. No statistically significant differences were observed between scanned and unscanned samples across these parameters (Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon tests, p > 0.05). Although mitochondrial contamination estimates were marginally higher in scanned samples (p = 0.051), they largely remain below the widely accepted 5% threshold for genomic analysis. Moreover, this pattern was not observed when considering nuclear contamination. Within the limits of this non-paired design, these results suggest that µCT imaging, under the scanning parameters applied here, does not introduce large or systematic bias derived from disruptions in standard aDNA preservation metrics. Building on these observations and on our collaborative experience with the shared use of archaeological samples across complementary research lines, and given that our results show that µCT imaging under appropriate scanning conditions does not significantly compromise DNA preservation, we propose a sustainable, multi-step workflow that integrates biological profiling, osteobiography, imaging, and compositional pre-screening prior to molecular sampling. This approach aims to maximize the scientific information obtained from skeletal collections while minimizing destructive practices, thereby promoting ethical and sustainable research on irreplaceable anthropological remains, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyDNA, AncientPetrous BoneX-Ray MicrotomographyArgentinaDNA, MitochondrialHumansDNA, AncientDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID41973767
PMCPMC13075688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.