ArticlePloS one2026
Adverse events in different administration routes of Edaravone: A pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved intravenous edaravone for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in 2017, followed by the approval of the oral formulation in 2022. This study aims to utilize the FDA#39;s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to investigate the spectrum and timing of adverse events (AEs) associated with edaravone administration, employing repeatability analysis, the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) approach, Weibull distribution, and stratification methods. The investigation focuses on data collected from the first quarter of 2017 through the fourth quarter of 2024, aiming to identify adverse event signals and their temporal patterns related to both intravenous and oral edaravone administration. In total, 3,262 records of edaravone-related adverse reactions were identified; among these, 1,534 incidents were associated with intravenous administration, while 453 incidents pertained to oral administration. The analysis revealed distinct adverse reaction profiles for the two routes of administration. Notably, the spectrum of adverse reactions resulting from oral administration predominantly involved the respiratory system, digestive system, and skin damage. In contrast, intravenous administration was more frequently linked to complications associated with invasive procedures and local tissue damage. Furthermore, the timing of adverse reactions exhibited significant variability between the two routes. Weibull distribution analysis indicated that the median onset time for adverse reactions following intravenous administration was 35 days, whereas for oral administration, it was 27 days. Both analytical approaches identified early failure signals, suggesting that the risk of adverse events diminishes over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.