ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Quality of first antenatal care visits and perinatal outcomes: Evidence from a cohort study in Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa, and India.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antenatal care (ANC) is crucial for maternal and newborn health. Although ANC coverage has improved globally, ANC quality remains suboptimal. This study assessed the quality of first ANC visits and their association with perinatal outcomes. We used data from the eCohort study that collected longitudinal data on ANC utilization and quality until the end of pregnancy in Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa, and India. Perinatal outcomes of interest included fetal losses (miscarriages ≥13 weeks of gestation or stillbirths) and low birth weight (LBW) newborns. Good quality ANC at first visits was defined as receiving six essential care components: blood pressure measurement, blood and urine tests, ultrasound, iron and folic acid supplementation, and counseling on pregnancy danger signs. We conducted mixed-effect logistic regressions to assess associations between good quality ANC and perinatal outcomes, with sensitivity analyses where good quality ANC excluded ultrasound scans. Among 3,600 pregnant women followed until the end of pregnancy, 5.8% received all six components at their first visits (from 1.3% in India to 14.0% in Ethiopia), and 30.7% received five components (5.7% in India to 52.5% in Kenya). Between 3.7% of women in Ethiopia and 6.3% in India experienced a fetal loss. Between 8.5% of newborns in Ethiopia and 16.3% in India were born LBW. Good quality ANC at first visits was associated with a 32% to 59% lower risk of fetal loss (primary analysis: risk ratio (RR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10-0.72; sensitivity analysis: RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44-0.92). No significant associations were observed between good quality ANC and LBW. This study identified important gaps in ANC quality and found that good quality ANC is associated with a lower fetal loss risk. Investments must be made to improve ANC quality and ensure the delivery of essential care in pregnancy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.