ArticlePain2026
Encountering pain: images as a tool for collaborative approaches to pain medicine.
Article in Pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractChronic pain remains a multifactorial complex common condition, difficult for patients to communicate or fully understand. We argue the arts can raise public awareness, play a role in capturing patients' subjective narratives, improve wellbeing, and increase mutual understanding in the clinic. Through sharing findings from over 2 decades evidencing the value of photographic images as both assessment and communication tools, we demonstrate images can facilitate democratic and collaborative interaction, enabling patients to retain ownership of their illness experience. We describe how the cocreation of photographic images by a visual artist with chronic pain patients enabled individual pain meanings to emerge. The images were subsequently tested in NHS clinics with patients not involved in making them, and their impact evaluated from a variety of perspectives: linguistic; nonverbal, clinical, and psychotherapeutic. Through a series of projects, it was discovered that the visual language did not necessarily replace verbal language but reinvigorated it. Patients used the images to talk about their emotional and subjective states, the impact pain had on their lives and voice issues that mattered most to them, aligning with patient-centred care. Increased rapport and clinician patient affiliation was observed with image use and the value of an active shared physical space between clinician and patient. We posit that eliciting pain meanings is as valuable as measurement in a chronic pain context and that images can significantly increase validation. Cocreating an international set of images/pain cards could provide an economic and fruitful starting point for pain conversations and assessment globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.