Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41973675›Full record

ArticlePain2026

Encountering pain: images as a tool for collaborative approaches to pain medicine.

Deborah Padfield, Joanna M Zakrzewska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deborah PadfieldSlade School of Fine Art, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7805-1815
Joanna M ZakrzewskaRoyal National ENT & Eastman Dental Hospitals, Euston, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractChronic pain remains a multifactorial complex common condition, difficult for patients to communicate or fully understand. We argue the arts can raise public awareness, play a role in capturing patients' subjective narratives, improve wellbeing, and increase mutual understanding in the clinic. Through sharing findings from over 2 decades evidencing the value of photographic images as both assessment and communication tools, we demonstrate images can facilitate democratic and collaborative interaction, enabling patients to retain ownership of their illness experience. We describe how the cocreation of photographic images by a visual artist with chronic pain patients enabled individual pain meanings to emerge. The images were subsequently tested in NHS clinics with patients not involved in making them, and their impact evaluated from a variety of perspectives: linguistic; nonverbal, clinical, and psychotherapeutic. Through a series of projects, it was discovered that the visual language did not necessarily replace verbal language but reinvigorated it. Patients used the images to talk about their emotional and subjective states, the impact pain had on their lives and voice issues that mattered most to them, aligning with patient-centred care. Increased rapport and clinician patient affiliation was observed with image use and the value of an active shared physical space between clinician and patient. We posit that eliciting pain meanings is as valuable as measurement in a chronic pain context and that images can significantly increase validation. Cocreating an international set of images/pain cards could provide an economic and fruitful starting point for pain conversations and assessment globally.

Indexed as

Chronic PainPain ManagementPhotographyCommunicationHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsArtArts and healthCommunicationMedical and healthcare humanitiesPAINPhotographyTransdisciplinary

Identifiers

PMID41973675
PMCPMC13225247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.