Observational studyEuropean thyroid journal2026
Real-world efficacy of lenvatinib/pembrolizumab combination in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: case series from two Italian referral centers.
Observational study in European thyroid journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is an extremely aggressive cancer, traditionally refractory to conventional treatments. The combined therapy with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab (L + P) is supported by a preclinical rationale based on the distinctive immunological profile of ATC. We propose a real-life study to evaluate relevant clinical outcomes and identify survival predictors in a cohort of ATC patients treated with the combined therapy in two Italian referral centers. Methods: Sixteen ATC patients treated with the combination of L + P were retrospectively included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Baseline patient characteristics, including immuno-nutritional status (calculated using the CONUT score), were analyzed to identify potential predictors of response. Results: A median OS of 10 months (95% CI: 4.2-15.9 months) and a median PFS of 6.0 months (95% CI: 0-12.7 months) were observed after L + P therapy. Complete response was observed in 6.2% and partial response in 31.3% of patients, resulting in an ORR of 37.5%; the DCR was 68.8%. Progressive disease occurred in 25% of patients. Furthermore, a baseline CONUT score ≤ 2 resulted in a significantly longer OS (log-rank, P = 0.001) and PFS (P = 0.05) compared to CONUT score ≥ 3, while a non-significantly longer OS was observed between patients with a baseline ECOG PS of 0-2 and those with a baseline ECOG PS ≥ 3. Conclusion: Our study confirms the efficacy and safety of L + P therapy, identifying the CONUT score as a prognostic factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.