Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41973529›Full record

Observational studyEpilepsia2026

Ketamine in super-refractory status epilepticus: Combined value of inflammatory biomarkers and EEG features.

Stefania Pavan, Giulia Mazzon, Giovanni Furlanis, David Stokelj, Matteo Cegalin, Jacopo Della Toffola, Claudia Castellabate, Valeria Cecchinato, Erik Roman-Pognuz, Marinella Tomaselli and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stefania PavanClinical Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Trieste University Hospital-ASUGI, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3239-8446
Giulia MazzonClinical Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Trieste University Hospital-ASUGI, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0382-5975
Giovanni FurlanisClinical Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Trieste University Hospital-ASUGI, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9954-0239
David StokeljClinical Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Trieste University Hospital-ASUGI, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Matteo CegalinClinical Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Trieste University Hospital-ASUGI, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Jacopo Della ToffolaClinical Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Trieste University Hospital-ASUGI, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4908-5997
Claudia CastellabateClinical Neurophysiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Trieste University Hospital-ASUGI, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Valeria CecchinatoClinical Neurophysiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Trieste University Hospital-ASUGI, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Erik Roman-PognuzIntensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Medical Science, Trieste University Hospital-ASUGI, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0859-3424
Marinella TomaselliClinical Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Trieste University Hospital-ASUGI, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7986-8046
Paolo ManganottiClinical Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Trieste University Hospital-ASUGI, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5305-6268

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous ketamine in a cohort of patients with super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) and to explore whether specific clinical, laboratory, and EEG patterns could predict treatment response.

methodsThis single-center retrospective observational study included all adult patients treated with intravenous ketamine for SRSE between August 2020 and September 2025, at the University Hospital of Trieste. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and EEG data were collected from medical records. EEG recordings obtained during and after ketamine infusion were analyzed according to American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) terminology. Associations between baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and laboratory and EEG patterns were examined using univariate statistics, and an exploratory EEG severity score, the KEOS (Ketamine EEG Outcome Score), was constructed to assess predictive accuracy.

resultsTwelve patients met the inclusion criteria. The sustained response rate, defined as seizure cessation without recurrence after complete anesthetic withdrawal, was 58%. Non-responders exhibited a profound hyperinflammatory state at the onset of status epilepticus, with significantly higher levels of composite indices such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI), and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII). Moreover, a "beta background" pattern was significantly more frequent among responders, whereas discontinuous or burst-suppression backgrounds were associated with poor outcomes. The KEOS demonstrated excellent discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] = .97, sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 85.7%). Adverse events were mild, with transient liver enzyme elevation in 42% of patients. SIGNIFICANCE: Intravenous ketamine showed moderate efficacy and a favorable safety profile in this SRSE cohort. The identification of specific EEG signatures together with systemic inflammatory biomarkers suggests the potential for a more biologically informed approach to ketamine monitoring and treatment optimization. However, given the limited sample size, these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating and warrant validation in larger, prospective multicenter studies.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyElectroencephalographyKetamineStatus EpilepticusAdultBiomarkersFemaleHumansInflammationMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersKetamineEEG monitoringinflammatory biomarkersneurocritical careNMDA receptor antagoniststatus epilepticus

Identifiers

PMID41973529
PMCPMC13360946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.