Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41973504›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2026

The Role of Movement on the Development of the Audiotactile Temporal Binding Window.

Monica Gori, Maria Bianca Amadeo, Margherita Sturlese, Martina Riberto, Anna Vitale, Jessica Bertolasi, David A Tovar, David J Lewkowicz, Micah M Murray, Mark T Wallace and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Monica GoriUnit for Visually Impaired People, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Maria Bianca AmadeoUnit for Visually Impaired People, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Margherita SturleseUnit for Visually Impaired People, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Martina RibertoUnit for Visually Impaired People, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9662-7163
Anna VitaleUnit for Visually Impaired People, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Jessica BertolasiUnit for Visually Impaired People, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1452-146X
David A TovarMultisensory Research Lab, Department of Psychology and Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
David J LewkowiczChild Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6685-3178
Micah M MurrayThe Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Tennessee, Switzerland.
Mark T WallaceMultisensory Research Lab, Department of Psychology and Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
Helene VitaliUnit for Visually Impaired People, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

Multisensory Environments to study Longitudinal Development
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception of temporal correspondence between sensory signals from body movements and those arising through environmental interactions is crucial for multisensory integration and adaptive behavior. In adults, the perception of multisensory temporal alignment is more accurate during active than passive or no movement. Currently, it is not known whether this is the case in children. Thus, we used an audiotactile temporal order judgment task (TOJ) to investigate multisensory temporal perception during active and passive arm movement in 6 to11-year-old blindfolded children (N = 87). Results indicated that temporal precision during active movement improved relative to passive movement only in younger children (6-year-olds). The active-passive difference diminished with age, with precision in the passive condition improving. Conversely, the temporal bias developed similarly in active and passive conditions, showing an age-related decrease, whereby tactile stimuli must precede auditory ones to be perceived as simultaneous. The study suggests that the maturation of the audiotactile temporal perception during movement involves two distinct mechanisms: an early sensorimotor integration of predicted sensory feedback and a faster-developing multisensory integration aligned with kinesthetic feedback, each following different developmental trajectories. SUMMARY: We proposed a task to study whether active and passive movements affect temporal perception of audiotactile stimuli in children. Temporal precision increased during the active than passive movement in younger children (6-year-old). The active-passive difference diminished with age, with precision in the passive condition improving. The maturation of the audio-tactile perception during movement involves the sensorimotor and multisensory integration mechanisms with two different developmental trajectories.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionTime PerceptionTouch PerceptionAcoustic StimulationChildChild DevelopmentFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansMaleMovementTouchactive and passive movementdevelopmentschool‐age childrentime perceptionTOJ

Identifiers

PMID41973504
PMCPMC13075528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.