ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
A deep learning approach for predicting sensory-motor integration in postural stability.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To maintain postural stability, reliable sensory input and appropriate motor responses are essential. In this study, a novel deep learning approach was proposed to evaluate postural stability by estimating sensory input capabilities (equilibrium score) and corresponding motor responses (movement strategy) from standing center of pressure (COP) signals. The model inputs were COP signals from quiet standing, with short-time Fourier transform (STFT) and wavelet transform (WT) employed as feature extraction methods. The models included GoogleNet and residual attention network (RAN) architectures, with feature distribution smoothing (FDS) applied to mitigate performance degradation caused by class imbalance in the target data. The starting point and bin number for FDS were incorporated as design parameters, with the mean squared error serving as the cost function during the hyperparameter optimization process. The STFT + RAN + FDS model achieved average errors of 0.89 for the equilibrium score and 0.72 for the movement strategy, demonstrating improvements of approximately 48% and 38% compared to the WT + RAN and STFT + RAN models, respectively. The proposed approach effectively predicts postural stability by leveraging COP signal features and advanced model architectures. It holds potential as a cost-effective and accessible solution for addressing postural stability issues, particularly for the growing population of patients with dizziness disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41973399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.