ReviewOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026
Current Evidence on Options and Efficacy of Combination Therapy for Myopia Control-A Narrative Review.
Review in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adjunctive 0.05% Atropine for Children with Continued Rapid Myopia Progression During Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments Spectacle Lens Treatment: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Knowledge and Practices of South African Optometrists Regarding Childhood Myopia Management.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCombination therapy for controlling myopia progression has become a topic of interest among both clinicians and researchers because of the rising demand to control rapidly progressing myopia. This review recapitulates the need and basis of combination therapy, the different classes of combination options available, their safety and efficacy. RECENT
findingsOverall, combination therapies demonstrated greater control of axial elongation than monotherapy. Myopia control spectacles with atropine showed axial elongation of 0.05-0.28 mm/year compared with 0.13-0.41 mm/year with monotherapy. Orthokeratology plus atropine reduced axial elongation by an additional 0.09-0.29 mm compared to orthokeratology alone, 0.19 to 0.48 mm over 12-24 months. Evidence for multifocal contact lenses with atropine remains limited. Emerging combinations, including light therapy and pharmacological agents (other than atropine) with optical strategies, need more evidence. Combination therapy appears to be well tolerated with reports showing minimal adverse effects, which need to be carefully assessed on a case-by-case manner. By potentially targeting multiple biological pathways, combination therapy is becoming one of the promising approaches to enhance myopia control efficacy, particularly in fast progressors. Combination therapy presents challenges, including issues with compliance with both modalities, managing side-effects and increased expense. Therefore, combination therapy may be better reserved for individuals with fast progression, be it predicted or established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41973380What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.