Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41973371›Full record

ReviewChild psychiatry and human development2026

Family Interventions for Children and Adolescents with Psychotic Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Valentina Kieseppä, Jenni Leppänen, Colm Healy, Ulla Lång, Juha Veijola, Ian Kelleher

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Child psychiatry and human development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valentina KieseppäCentre of Clinical Brain Science, Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. valentina.kieseppa@oulu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5366-7448
Jenni LeppänenCentre of Clinical Brain Science, Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2814-4375
Colm HealyCentre of Clinical Brain Science, Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7974-1861
Ulla LångCentre of Clinical Brain Science, Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Juha VeijolaResearch Unit of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Ian KelleherCentre of Clinical Brain Science, Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1484-651X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend family interventions for children and adolescents with psychosis. However, the evidence to support this has not been fully synthesised to date. This meta-analytic review investigated whether family interventions are effective in reducing psychosis symptoms and improving functioning among children and adolescents with psychosis. We included studies which (1) employed a controlled study design to examine the effectiveness of a family intervention, (2) only included children or adolescents with psychosis, and (3) assessed psychosis symptoms and/or general functioning. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, OVID, CNKI, EBSCO and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched on the 19th of March 2024, supplemented by grey literature searches. Study quality was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tools. Bayesian meta-analyses were conducted to examine changes in symptoms and functioning. Four studies (n = 111) met inclusion criteria. All studies assessed the effectiveness of different psychoeducation-based family interventions. The meta-analyses showed no significant effect of family interventions on psychosis symptoms (pooled effect size = -0.93, 95% CrI [-2.77, 0.90]) or functioning (pooled effect size = 0.90, 95% CrI [-1.07, 2.70]) and indicated weak evidence in favour of the null hypotheses. We did not find evidence of a significant benefit of family interventions on psychosis symptoms or functioning in children and adolescents with psychosis. All included studies had significant methodological issues, which may have introduced bias. These results highlight a lack of evidence of the effectiveness of family interventions in children and adolescents with psychosis.

Indexed as

AdolescentsChildrenFamily interventionPsychosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.