Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41973320›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2026

Impact of deep learning image reconstruction on ADC quantification and histogram metrics: a phantom study.

Simona Marzi, Vicente Bruzzaniti, Francesca Laganaro, Giovanni Di Giulio, Michele Farella, Alessia Tonnetti, Irene Terrenato, Roberto Castellana, Antonello Vidiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Simona MarziMedical Physics Laboratory, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy. simona.marzi@ifo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9845-4400
Vicente BruzzanitiMedical Physics Laboratory, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Francesca LaganaroRadiology and Diagnostic Imaging Department, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni Di GiulioRadiology and Diagnostic Imaging Department, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Michele FarellaRadiology and Diagnostic Imaging Department, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Alessia TonnettiDepartment of Clinical Engineering and Information Technology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Irene TerrenatoBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Roberto CastellanaRadiology and Diagnostic Imaging Department, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Antonello VidiriRadiology and Diagnostic Imaging Department, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecently, deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction methods have been introduced into clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems to enhance image quality and reduce acquisition time. However, their effects on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps remain unclear. We investigated whether DL-based image reconstruction influences ADC quantification and histogram-based ADC metrics using a calibrated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) phantom. MATERIALS AND

methodsA phantom containing vials with known ADC values was scanned on a 3-T system using full (fFOV) and reduced (rFOV) field-of-view DWI sequences. Each acquisition was performed using conventional (DL-OFF) and three DL-based strength levels (low, medium, high). Median ADC values were analyzed for repeatability (coefficient of variation (CV)) and accuracy. Histogram changes and first-order radiomic features were assessed using the Wasserstein distance, Friedman, and Wilcoxon tests.

resultsADC estimates showed high repeatability (CV 0.1-1.2%) and good accuracy (deviation -2 to 7%) across all DL levels and sequences. DL reconstruction progressively reduced histogram dispersion, particularly in high-ADC vials. Wasserstein distances increased with DL strength, confirming a progressive effect on ADC value distributions, while median ADC values remained unchanged. Entropy and interquartile range decreased significantly (p < 0.001), whereas kurtosis and skewness increased, with differences showing less stable and sequence-dependent statistical significance.

conclusionDL-based reconstruction maintained accurate and repeatable ADC quantification while reducing the dispersion of ADC values. The effect was more evident for high-ADC regions and the rFOV sequence, resulting in narrower distributions of ADC values. Further investigations comparing different DL-based solutions are warranted to assess the generalizability of these findings in clinical settings. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Over the past decade, ADC histogram analysis has proven valuable for quantifying tumor heterogeneity, differentiating tumor grade, and evaluating early treatment response. Deep learning reconstruction narrows ADC distributions and reduces dispersion, supporting its potential in oncologic DWI, while highlighting the need for patient-based validation studies. KEY POINTS: DL reconstruction preserved ADC accuracy in both full FOV and reduced FOV DWI. ADC repeatability remained high across DL levels for both DWI sequences. Histogram dispersion progressively reduced across DL levels, particularly in high-ADC vials. Entropy and interquartile ranges decreased progressively with increasing DL strength.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingHumansRadiomicsReproducibility of ResultsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingImage processing (computer-assisted)Radiomics

Identifiers

PMID41973320
PMCPMC13076709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.