ArticleJournal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology2026
Comparative Effectiveness of Rituximab in Treatment-Naïve vs. Switch Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Real-World Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is increasingly used off-label for multiple sclerosis (MS), particularly in regions where access to approved B-cell–depleting therapies is limited. This study evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of rituximab in treatment-naïve and switch patients at a single center in Saudi Arabia.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, 102 patients with MS treated with rituximab between January 2018 and October 2025 were analyzed. Patients were categorized as treatment-naïve (n = 48) or switch (n = 54). The primary endpoint was No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-3) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included annualized relapse rate (ARR), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), MRI activity, and safety. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of NEDA-3, with findings interpreted as exploratory due to the absence of correction for multiple comparisons.
resultsRituximab was associated with substantial reductions in relapse activity and absence of new MRI lesions. NEDA-3 was achieved in 93.8% of treatment-naïve and 83.3% of switch patients (p = 0.60). After adjustment for age, sex, disease duration, baseline ARR, and EDSS, the difference between groups was not statistically significant (adjusted OR = 1.52; 95% CI: 0.54–4.32; p = 0.43). ARR declined significantly in both groups (p < 0.001), with all treatment-naïve patients remaining relapse-free. No new or enlarging T2 or gadolinium-enhancing lesions were observed on 12-month follow-up MRI. EDSS remained stable. Rituximab was generally well tolerated: mild infusion reactions occurred in 3 patients (2.9%), and 3 mild infections were documented (all in the switch group). However, serum immunoglobulins were not routinely monitored, limiting assessment of infection risk related to humoral immunosuppression. Lower baseline ARR independently predicted NEDA-3 achievement (adjusted OR = 0.58 per additional relapse; 95% CI: 0.36–0.91; p = 0.02).
conclusionIn this single-center Saudi cohort, rituximab was associated with high short-term NEDA-3 rates and acceptable tolerability in both treatment-naïve and switch patients. A baseline ARR > 2.5 relapses/year may identify individuals at higher risk of treatment non-response. Given the retrospective design, single-center setting, short follow-up (median 14 months), and lack of immunoglobulin monitoring, findings should be interpreted cautiously. Prospective multicenter studies with standardized immune monitoring and longer follow-up are needed to confirm long-term safety and effectiveness. REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Security Forces Hospital, Makkah (IRB #0749-081024; HAP-02-K-052), with waiver of informed consent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41973316What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.