ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2026
The effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on vigilance, cognition, and mood during military exercise with acute sleep deprivation.
Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation, tolerability, and the Alpha/Theta EEG ratio: a controlled pilot study relevant to emotion regulation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation provides a promising tool for supporting performance under demanding conditions, particularly during sleep deprivation. This study investigated the effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and stimulation intensity on vigilance, sustained attention, response inhibition, self-reported mood, and sleepiness in military conscripts during a 24-h training period that included total sleep deprivation. Forty-eight male conscripts completed the study. Vigilance was assessed using the psychomotor vigilance task and sustained attention and response inhibition with the sustained attention to response task. Before the stimulation, participants adjusted the stimulation intensity individually. The stimulation duration was 4 min. For the stimulation group (n = 24), the intensity ranged from 12 to 26 mA. In the sham group (N = 24), stimulation was ramped down to 0 mA during the first minute. Vigilant attention decreased with prolonged wakefulness in both groups. However, during the early morning hours at 5 am and 7 am, this impairment showed modest attenuation with increasing stimulation intensities; higher intensities were associated with smaller decrements in vigilance. No effects of stimulation were found on response inhibition. The response inhibition task is more motivationally salient than the simple vigilance task, and the impact of sleep deprivation can be obscured by strategic slowing of responses to minimize errors. Also, higher stimulation intensity was associated with a smaller shift toward negative emotional valence measured after the response inhibition task. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation shows potential to support vigilance during sleep deprivation in monotonous tasks, such as radar monitoring and surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.