ReviewVeterinary research communications2026
Mineral-microbiota interactions in aquaculture: implications for fish gut health and nutrition.
Review in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybridization-Driven Herbivorous Adaptation in Fish: Morphological, Digestive, Transcriptome, and Microbial Evidence from a Hybrid ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dietary minerals and gut microbiota engage in a dynamic, bidirectional relationship that shapes the health, immune competence, and productive performance of farmed fish and shrimp. This review explores the bidirectional interactions between mineral supplementation and microbial communities within the gastrointestinal tract of farmed fish and examines the effects of individual and combined mineral supplementation including iron, zinc, magnesium, selenium, manganese, and copper in inorganic, organic, and nanoparticle forms on the intestinal microbiota and histomorphology of farmed aquatic species. Minerals serve essential physiological roles while simultaneously modulating microbial diversity, composition, and metabolic activity; conversely, the gut microbiota influences mineral bioavailability and absorption through enzymatic transformations and competitive uptake. Studies conducted on yellow catfish, largemouth bass, golden pompano, grouper, Nile tilapia, Chinese tongue sole, Pacific white shrimp, channel catfish, zebrafish, and Oriental river prawn were comprehensively examined. Findings indicate that organic and nanoparticle mineral forms generally exhibit higher bioavailability and more favorable effects on intestinal health compared to conventional inorganic sources, with partial substitution strategies (e.g., ~ 50% organic mineral replacement) yielding optimal outcomes in combined formulations. Optimized mineral supplementation was further associated with enrichment of beneficial microbiota, enhanced mucosal barrier integrity through goblet cell proliferation, and reinforcement of innate immune responses, collectively supporting nutrient assimilation, growth performance, and disease resistance. However, the reviewed studies share critical limitations: species diversity was narrow, experimental durations were short (8–80 days), no trial encompassed a full reproductive cycle, and the mechanisms underlying mineral–microbiota crosstalk remain incompletely understood. Synergistic or antagonistic interactions among Zn, Cu, Mn, Fe, and Se are inadequately characterized, and dose optimization specific to species, age, and physiological status has not been achieved. Future research should incorporate long-term and multigenerational designs, metagenomic and metabolomic analyses, comparative multi-mineral trials, and the integration of microbiome-based diagnostics to tailor mineral interventions, alongside validation under commercial aquaculture conditions and ecotoxicological assessment of nanoparticles in aquatic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.