Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41973308›Full record

ReviewVeterinary research communications2026

Mineral-microbiota interactions in aquaculture: implications for fish gut health and nutrition.

Fatmagün Aydin, Şehriban Çek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Aquaculture nutrition · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatmagün AydinBiotechnology Research and Application Center, Cukurova University, Adana, 01330, Türkiye. faydin@cu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7852-307X
Şehriban ÇekFaculty of Marine Science and Technology, Iskenderun Technical University, İskenderun, Hatay, 31200, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1676-5035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary minerals and gut microbiota engage in a dynamic, bidirectional relationship that shapes the health, immune competence, and productive performance of farmed fish and shrimp. This review explores the bidirectional interactions between mineral supplementation and microbial communities within the gastrointestinal tract of farmed fish and examines the effects of individual and combined mineral supplementation including iron, zinc, magnesium, selenium, manganese, and copper in inorganic, organic, and nanoparticle forms on the intestinal microbiota and histomorphology of farmed aquatic species. Minerals serve essential physiological roles while simultaneously modulating microbial diversity, composition, and metabolic activity; conversely, the gut microbiota influences mineral bioavailability and absorption through enzymatic transformations and competitive uptake. Studies conducted on yellow catfish, largemouth bass, golden pompano, grouper, Nile tilapia, Chinese tongue sole, Pacific white shrimp, channel catfish, zebrafish, and Oriental river prawn were comprehensively examined. Findings indicate that organic and nanoparticle mineral forms generally exhibit higher bioavailability and more favorable effects on intestinal health compared to conventional inorganic sources, with partial substitution strategies (e.g., ~ 50% organic mineral replacement) yielding optimal outcomes in combined formulations. Optimized mineral supplementation was further associated with enrichment of beneficial microbiota, enhanced mucosal barrier integrity through goblet cell proliferation, and reinforcement of innate immune responses, collectively supporting nutrient assimilation, growth performance, and disease resistance. However, the reviewed studies share critical limitations: species diversity was narrow, experimental durations were short (8–80 days), no trial encompassed a full reproductive cycle, and the mechanisms underlying mineral–microbiota crosstalk remain incompletely understood. Synergistic or antagonistic interactions among Zn, Cu, Mn, Fe, and Se are inadequately characterized, and dose optimization specific to species, age, and physiological status has not been achieved. Future research should incorporate long-term and multigenerational designs, metagenomic and metabolomic analyses, comparative multi-mineral trials, and the integration of microbiome-based diagnostics to tailor mineral interventions, alongside validation under commercial aquaculture conditions and ecotoxicological assessment of nanoparticles in aquatic environments.

Indexed as

AquacultureFishesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMineralsAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsGastrointestinal TractMineralsMicrobiomeMineral bioavailabilitySustainable aquacultureTrace minerals

Identifiers

PMID41973308
PMCPMC13076410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.