ArticleJournal of medical systems2026
SHIELD: An AI Framework for Skeletal Health Intelligence and Early Lesion Detection to Improve Orthopedic Referrals.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delays in the referral of patients with suspected metastatic bone disease (MBD) from radiology reports represent a critical challenge that can negatively impact patient outcomes. The conventional manual review process is often a significant bottleneck for triaging, leading to prolonged diagnostic timelines. We developed and validated SHIELD, an automated AI framework designed to accelerate and improve the accuracy of MBD referrals. We fine-tuned a RadBERT-RoBERTa model on a decade of radiology reports (N = 245 patients) from two academic medical centers to classify reports into three tiers: “No Referral,” “Referral,” and “Referral/High Risk.” To ensure clinical utility and transparency, SHIELD incorporates a Large Language Model to generate natural-language explanations for its classifications designed to support clinical interpretability and auditability. SHIELD demonstrated high performance on a hold-out test set. It achieved 100% accuracy and an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 1.00 in the primary binary task of distinguishing referral from non-referral cases. In the more granular three-class task, the model achieved an overall accuracy of 90%, with near-perfect performance in identifying “No Referral” reports (F1-score: 100%). Critically, the model operated in a clinically “fail-safe” manner, never misclassifying a high-risk case as requiring no referral. A retrospective timeline analysis revealed that SHIELD can reduce the referral period from a conventional average of 109.6 days to a computational time of 1–3 min. Proposed work provides high accuracy with a sophisticated explainability component using a large language model. Thus, SHIELD framework is a robust, explainable, and autonomous solution for triaging radiology reports. By drastically reducing administrative and diagnostic delays, it has the potential to significantly accelerate the clinical workflow, ensure timely specialist consultation, and ultimately improve the standard of care for patients with suspected MBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.