ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Clinical, haematological, and biochemical responses of rectal oxygen-ozone administration in sheep.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The administration of ozone has been shown to benefit human and animal health in various areas because of its anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antiparasitic, and antiviral effects. The effects of ozone on the health status of farm animals have not yet been described. This study hypothesises that rectal administration of an oxygen–ozone mixture in sheep is safe and causes no harm to the animals. To evaluate the clinical, haematological, and biochemical responses of sheep following rectal administration of an oxygen–ozone mixture, 10 sheep were used and divided into two experimental groups: the oxygen group (GO2), which was subjected to rectal insufflation with oxygen, and the ozone group (GO2/O3), which was subjected to rectal insufflation with an oxygen-ozone mixture. The treatments were carried out three times a week for four weeks. The animals were clinically assessed before and after all applications, and blood samples were taken at five time points. There were significant differences within the groups in the number of total leucocytes and the serum concentrations of GGT, total protein, albumin, and bilirubin, but the variations did not alter significantly between the treatment and control groups, except for total protein and AST. All variations, significant or not, were all kept within physiological reference limits. The results showed that treatment with the oxygen-ozone mixture did not lead to significant clinical and/or haematological changes in sheep. Therefore, ozone therapy seems to be safe to administer in sheep and should continue to be studied as an alternative treatment option for this species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.