Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41973259›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026

Bird collisions with wind generators in China: a review of avoidance and minimization measures.

Emil Friedrich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emil FriedrichResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China. emil33f@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As wind energy becomes a key pillar in global decarbonization strategies, preventing bird collisions with wind turbines has become a critical ecological challenge. This review focuses on methods for avoidance and minimization of bird collisions, with a particular emphasis on their applicability in China-the world's largest wind energy producer. International measures to mitigate bird collision are synthesized, e.g., siting strategies, detection-reaction systems (DRSs), turbine painting, ultraviolet (UV) lighting, manual curtailment, Bluetooth-based detection, acoustic deterrents, and habitat management. Each method is evaluated in terms of technical feasibility, ecological effectiveness, and implementation challenges. While siting remains the best preventive measure, dynamic technologies such as AI-enhanced DRSs and integrated habitat management show promising potential. However, data scarcity, regulatory gaps, and limited empirical testing continue to hinder widespread adoption in China. The paper concludes by recommending multi-layered strategies that combine pre-construction planning, real-time monitoring, and post-construction habitat adaptation, alongside the need for improved national monitoring systems and context-specific field trials.

Indexed as

BirdsPower PlantsWindAnimalsChinaConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringBird collisionsChinese wind farmsMitigation measuresWind energy

Identifiers

PMID41973259
PMCPMC13076401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.